Is it only physical violence against women that we don’t tolerate?

I’ve been struggling to understand why hate crime against women is treated differently to hate crime against other groups. Two examples: the Sentencing Council proposed in their public consultation that gender-based hate was excluded as a culpability factor in sexual offences. And the UK Government’s plan to tackle hate crime – ‘challenge it, report it, stop it’ – specifically excludes hate crime against women. I asked the Home Office if they could explain the thinking here. They said:

“…the definition of hate crime (any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice) was considered and agreed by criminal justice agencies in 2007. It was deliberately left open to acknowledge hate crime as a victim perception based crime, whereby if an offence is committed against a person and the victim believes that they were the target of hostility because of a particular characteristic, then it should be recorded as such.  It applies to any offence, so can include forms of violence against women and girls (VAWG). Where gender-based hostility is a particular priority in a local area, the police and their local partners are encouraged to include it in their local hate crime strategies.  I understand that this already happens in some areas.

However, at the same time criminal justice agencies also agreed on specific hate crimes that would be monitored by criminal justice agencies, in an effort to gather data that was not nationally collected.  Gender-based hostility was considered but not included, and this was due to a number of factors.  In particular, there are already specific criminal offences for many types of VAWG, including rape, sexual assault and female genital mutilation, and legislation in place to cover domestic violence, harassment, including stalking, where data is already collected nationally.”

How many women are aware that if they perceive abuse as a gender-based hate-crime then the police have to record it as such? Consistently leaving gender-based hate crime out of government policy documents will not increase this awareness.

West Yorkshire Police don’t follow the Home Office guidelines. On their hate-crime page they say that hate crimes is defined as, “Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s disability or perceived disability, race or perceived race, religion or perceived religion, sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation, or against a person who is transgender or perceived to be transgender.” So not “gender-based” despite the criminal justice agencies agreeing it could be in 2007.

If there any police forces following the Home Office guidelines then how seriously do they take gender-based hate crime as opposed to race-based hate crime for example? The posts on Ihollaback suggest that very few crimes (I think virtually every post I’ve seen on there is a hate crime; in many cases other crimes have been committed as well) are being reported to the police. It is a similar situation on the Every Day Sexism Project. If only 1 in 10 women who experience serious sexual assault are reporting it to the police then I guess not many. The police should have data.

I’ve gone back to the Home Office to ask how many police forces thought that stopping verbal and psychological abuse being committed against people because of their gender was a particular priority in their area and worthy of inclusion in their local hate crime strategy. Ihollaback shows the abuse is nationwide – lets see what the police think.

One thing that I interpret from the Government approach is that they are only really bothered about physical abuse of women. This approach fails to acknowledge the link between the cultural acceptance of verbal and psychological abuse against women and violence against women.

Footnote: The press release for ‘challenge it, report it, stop it’ states that Lynne Featherstone is the Equalities Minister for the Home Office. This is an error which the Home Office will fix.



  1. M.F.Machado

    So far, no clear definition has been given to the word: terrorism. But, investigating facts, anyone will notice that there is always some degree of hate involved in terrorist acts, and therefore, that terrorism fits within one, or other, definitions given to crimes of hate. In Brazil, a country presided by terrorists since 2003, crimes of hate against religious freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of writing, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, are official, as official are also their crimes of hate against the national minority of retired federal workers.

  2. M.F.Machado

    In Brazil, every four minutes a woman is killed. This is the chief cause of the death of women from 16 to 44 years of age, in Brazil. (Date of the news: March 21st, 2013; source of the news: “Painéis abordam panorama da violência contra a mulher no RS e no Brasil”).

    • jc

      That is terrible. I found some information about violence against women in Brazil here: …domestic violence was not a part of Brazil’s federal criminal code until 2006 (the ‘Maria da Penha law’). The article says that “incidents of domestic violence are still high and underreported to the authorities, due to fear of retribution, further violence, and social stigma”. So having the right laws in place is an essential building block, but the criminal justice system must vehemently enforce those laws to start to make the culture change needed. Everyone has a responsibility of course, not just governments and law enforcement, but their role is so fundamentally important that they have to be a prime target for the activist, whether in Brazil or the UK.

      • godtisx

        Very disturbing. It’s also disturbing because gender based hostility appears in the form of posturing and verbal intimidation before it escalates to a physical act (in some situations). So basically there is practice which supports addressing it as it escalates sort of speak.

  3. Ruth Jacobs

    Reblogged this on Ruth Jacobs and commented:
    “How many women are aware that if they perceive abuse as a gender-based hate-crime then the police have to record it as such? Consistently leaving gender-based hate crime out of government policy documents will not increase this awareness.”

  4. Pingback: The emerging tensions between police forces on how to police prostitution | What Can I Do About It?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s