Blowing the Whistle

Blowing the whistle is a frightening thought. The evidence shows that blowing the whistle might not result in the issue you were trying to expose being dealt with, and might lead to you being bullied, counter-accused, sacked, and shunned by your co-workers.

Why are whistle-blowers sometimes treated badly?

One reason is that corporate culture does not normally value whistle-blowing. There may be whistle-blowing policies, but in reality the focus of the board, whether private or public sector, is on short-term financial results and performance targets. The people working within these cultures are therefore much less likely to raise the alarm, and much less likely to be treated with respect if they do. The Mid-Staffs and Winterbourne Inquires will highlight this again.

Also, wrong-doers do not want to be exposed and so, enabled by inadequate whistleblowing processes, they will strive to turn the accusations back on the accuser. Sibel Edmonds vs FBI is a good example of this, as are the prosecutions of Kostas Vaxevanis for publishing the ‘Largarde List’ naming over 2,000 Greek tax cheats. And of course Guardian Newspaper’s Person of the Year 2012, Bradley Manning.

And because most organisations are male dominated, women can find it particularly difficult to raise the alarm, often finding the wrongdoer (if male) has a network ready to back him up and support the counter-accusations, enabled by the cultural bias towards the male.

What is being done to improve the situation?

Within the National Health Service, the NHS Constitution was changed to:

  • Put an onus on staff to report wrong-doing… but this suggests the problem is caused by the irresponsibility of staff in the same way that it is apparently the coldness of nurses which is leading to failures in care.
  • Include a pledge that management will investigate concerns and ensure there is an independent body for staff to speak to… but what ‘investigate’ means is not specified. And the Care Quality Commission has failed to act in many cases and routinely relies on evidence provided by the employer rather than the staff member.

But maybe there is more hope with the new ‘duty of candour’ which will place a contractual obligation on all NHS bodies, including private providers to the NHS, to tell patients if their safety has been compromised? The duty is designed to encourage a more open culture, but it won’t create a fully open culture. The duty has been watered down from the original Lib Dem manifesto promise to put a legal duty in place. The need for a full legal duty is put forward on the Robbie’s Law campaign site.

Where can potential whistle-blowers go for support?

Comments very welcome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s